Yeah I like Golladay a lot, a healthy Marvin Jones is good and Hockinson could be impactful but Stafford has had more receiving targets to work with in the past, KJ is a good RB but i'm not sure I'd say great yet, CJ Anderson is ok but nothing special, Ty Johnson has potential, it's a decent offense but we've seen better.
Oh my god they are coming out of the woodwork like roaches. If I want any shit out you I will squeeze your head.
Oh no someone on the internet disagrees with you!?!? The horror...
Oh my god they are coming out of the woodwork like roaches. If I want any shit out you I will squeeze your head.
Oh no someone on the internet disagrees with you!?!? The horror...
That is the problem. If you knew what you were talking about then we would agree. But you give your opinion like it is a fact and that is not support for your argument. capiche
Have at it you mean monster? I just stated some facts that contradict your boy's attitude toward Stafford and you butt in. Then you support your boy and the argument with "Because I said so" Normal for you. Next you will start changing the subject or do some other nanner nanner shit.
I actually agreed with both of you. You’re just too stupid and thin skinned to comprehend it. They must have forgot to give out the meds at the home tonight.
Stafford has had rosters with plenty of talent around them in the pass. He also had was pretty successful when he did.
You’re the only person dumb enough to get pissy when someone agrees with your general point.
Do you even know what BB said. His bold prediction was Stafford to be benched. Now you want to argue if he has had better targets in the past and it was not the point moron. Good job following the discussion now butt out readtard.
Last Edit: Sept 1, 2019 19:37:14 GMT -6 by liongeezer
I actually agreed with both of you. You’re just too stupid and thin skinned to comprehend it. They must have forgot to give out the meds at the home tonight.
Stafford has had rosters with plenty of talent around them in the pass. He also had was pretty successful when he did.
You’re the only person dumb enough to get pissy when someone agrees with your general point.
Do you even know what BB said. His bold prediction was Stafford to be benched. Now you want to argue if he has had better targets in the past and it was not the point moron. Good job following the discussion now butt out readtard.
And he said he’s had weapons before. That’s the part I agree with.
It’s possible to talk about multiple things from a post. It may be a lot for you given the low IQ and dementia, but some of us “readtards” are capable.
Last Edit: Sept 1, 2019 19:50:05 GMT -6 by badnews3123
Do you even know what BB said. His bold prediction was Stafford to be benched. Now you want to argue if he has had better targets in the past and it was not the point moron. Good job following the discussion now butt out readtard.
And he said he’s had weapons before. That’s the part I agree with.
It’s possible to talk about multiple things from a post. It may be a lot for you given the low IQ and dementia, but some of us “readtards” are capable.
Right and if you read what I said correctly, I was comparing quantity of targets, not quality, readtard. So lets compare the low IQ and dementia of the Geezer with the readtard. All I have to say is "You are already in trouble and it will get worse in future years Badnews".
Last Edit: Sept 2, 2019 4:09:13 GMT -6 by liongeezer
And he said he’s had weapons before. That’s the part I agree with.
It’s possible to talk about multiple things from a post. It may be a lot for you given the low IQ and dementia, but some of us “readtards” are capable.
Right and if you read what I said correctly, I was comparing quantity of targets, not quality, readtard. So lets compare the low IQ and dementia of the Geezer with the readtard. All I have to say is "You are already in trouble and it will get worse in future years Badnews".
He had the same “quantity” of targets Geezer, they aren’t carrying more players, so yes the “quality” of them had to be a factor for you to bring it up.
My point was that I think he’s had similar to arguably better weapons in the past AND when he did, he played well. Which really supports the point you were trying to make. So good job on arguing against a small point that really went in support of your larger argument. Dumbass.
Post by badnews3123 on Sept 2, 2019 5:27:43 GMT -6
Practice Squad
DT John Atkins TE Isaac Nauta RB Mark Thompson WR Tom Kennedy LB Steve Longa WR Johnathan Duhart T Matt Nelson DE Johnarhan Wynn LB Anthony Pittman TE Austin Traylor
No PJ Johnson. Brandon Powell went to Falcons PS. Cabinda report must have been premature.
DT John Atkins TE Isaac Nauta RB Mark Thompson WR Tom Kennedy LB Steve Longa WR Johnathan Duhart T Matt Nelson DE Johnarhan Wynn LB Anthony Pittman TE Austin Traylor
No PJ Johnson. Brandon Powell went to Falcons PS. Cabinda report must have been premature.
Right and if you read what I said correctly, I was comparing quantity of targets, not quality, readtard. So lets compare the low IQ and dementia of the Geezer with the readtard. All I have to say is "You are already in trouble and it will get worse in future years Badnews".
He had the same “quantity” of targets Geezer, they aren’t carrying more players, so yes the “quality” of them had to be a factor for you to bring it up.
My point was that I think he’s had similar to arguably better weapons in the past AND when he did, he played well. Which really supports the point you were trying to make. So good job on arguing against a small point that really went in support of your larger argument. Dumbass.
He had Calvin and Tate in ‘14 and ‘15. Whatever you think the upgrade is at TE and RB, that alone is massive.
I thought Stafford really turned a corner in ‘15 when Cooter took over. From ‘15-‘17, I thought he played like a top 10 QB. Last year was sub-par, but I think there was a lot of stuff contributing to that.
The above is what you said earlier
This is last post
{He had the same “quantity” of targets Geezer, they aren’t carrying more players, so yes the “quality” of them had to be a factor for you to bring it up. My point was that I think he’s had similar to arguably better weapons in the past AND when he did, he played well. Which really supports the point you were trying to make. So good job on arguing against a small point that really went in support of your larger argument. Dumbass. }
These posts don't say the same thing, just saying. I definitely agree with the last post. Sorry for getting pissy, but the way you posted earlier was ambigious.
Last Edit: Sept 4, 2019 0:34:02 GMT -6 by liongeezer
He had Calvin and Tate in ‘14 and ‘15. Whatever you think the upgrade is at TE and RB, that alone is massive.
I thought Stafford really turned a corner in ‘15 when Cooter took over. From ‘15-‘17, I thought he played like a top 10 QB. Last year was sub-par, but I think there was a lot of stuff contributing to that.
The above is what you said earlier
This is last post
{He had the same “quantity” of targets Geezer, they aren’t carrying more players, so yes the “quality” of them had to be a factor for you to bring it up. My point was that I think he’s had similar to arguably better weapons in the past AND when he did, he played well. Which really supports the point you were trying to make. So good job on arguing against a small point that really went in support of your larger argument. Dumbass. }
These posts don't say the same thing, just saying. I definitely agree with the last post. Sorry for getting pissy, but the way you posted earlier was ambigious.
‘15 would be part of when I said he started to play like a top 10 QB, no? And if you wouldn’t have jumped off the deep end immediately we could have gone further into ‘16 with Tate, Jones, Boldin, Ebron, Riddick.
Could also get into ‘14 and first half of ‘15 when he had that talent but Lombardi was a big factor. Could look at ‘15 alone, when offense was producing around 19 points a game under Lombardi and after changing to Cooter averaged a full touchdown more at 26 over last 8. So OC can be a factor above talent, which Bevell has history to look at, but with this group is still a lot of unknown.
Last Edit: Sept 4, 2019 6:48:16 GMT -6 by badnews3123